Why is SOOO Much More Money Spent on Breast Cancer Rearch than on Prostate Cancer Reserach? - why more money spent on breast cancer than prostate cancer
Around 27,000 people in the United States die annually from prostate cancer. Approximately 40,000 women die of breast cancer each year.
Why do these women are selfish B ** tards complete through life complaining that changes in short, if the money is spent much more and help protect our mothers, our daughters, our parents and our children.
Women should be ashamed.
About 50 times more money for research on breast cancer in the Prostate paid.
This is sick! I believe that women and girls could give a shit about their parents and their children.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Why More Money Spent On Breast Cancer Than Prostate Cancer Why Is SOOO Much More Money Spent On Breast Cancer Rearch Than On Prostate Cancer Reserach?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
You seem very bitter about it. Is there someone in your area by prostate cancer and have difficulty supporting too? There are many effective treatments for prostate cancer. One is the implantation of small radioactive "seeds" in the prostate. They are as big as a grain of rice and work to bring the law of radiation to the prostate. After a certain time, which is no longer emitting radiation and are therefore safe, implanted into the prostate. Sorry if you are in a difficult time right now. Here are some links below.
(I agree, and you can see that you are quite rude if you look in the mirror. "To all the women to blame for this problem? Is the bulk of funding for breast cancer big business, so I assume that CEO will be cursed, not women. The women gathered to draw attention to breast cancer, and it took some time. I suppose if all people will be so passionate about this issue and begin a job as could be women, then you might Raisand awareness and money. I must say that people are lazy because they have not taken a position or an awareness of prostate cancer? No, we should not blame all women. These two issues are interrelated. It's not like there is an awareness, that is so for the 2 types of cancer! This is ridiculous and you know I need to point it! )
You're right, that receives less funding, but not 50-times available. According to the National Coalition of prostate cancer, breast cancer research will receive about 870 million U.S. dollars this year, compared to 485 million U.S. dollars for research into prostate cancer. The NPCC also notes that the U.S. is around 16,700 invested to find a cure for every life lost to prostate cancer and lost more than $ 21,800 per year of life to breast cancer. According to the American Cancer Society, 40,200 people die from breast cancer per year compared to 28,900 men with prostate cancer.
I think it must be partly due to the politicization of these two diseases in general, advocacy and lobbying Congress for funding is often women's groups for decades. Most men do not participate in these activities on a large scale and are not as vocal about their disease (s). However, I believe, to a large extent, perhaps due to age factor. For example, to develop in Articles 39 and older, 1 of 228 women, breast cancer, compared to 1 in 19,299 men who develop prostateCancer in this group that you like. It is possible that the death rates and age of pure early breast cancer can affect the goal of medical research, is considered the extension of life, freely translated ... more resources in the fight against diseases, the groups issued at a younger age to maximize lifetime for every dollar.
But all this despite the rhetoric, I understand your frustration. Thank you for posting a second thought, maybe it will be someone here to encourage you to make further progress in cash and commit / or activism of prostate cancer.
Here's an idea for you. Bite My pet.
Post a Comment